ontological argument

There used to be an ontological argument to prove the existence of God.

According to Salmon's critique, the ontological argument thus shows nothing.

This is the great vice of the Ontological argument.

He gives a thorough treatment of the ontological argument.

The ontological argument would be meaningful only to someone who understands the essence of God completely.

To these considerations could be added the ontological argument: life, like the rest of the Universe, exists simply because it can.

Mr. Nobody raises many ontological arguments about the subjective nature of time.

His version of the ontological argument can be summarised as follows:

The Ontological argument is also presented, but rejected in favor of proofs dealing with cause and effect alone.

Produced ontological argument for the existence of God.

Finally, one might adduce a variation of the Ontological Argument.

Gaunilo's objection to the ontological argument has been criticised on several grounds.

Therefore, if humans cannot fully conceive of God, the ontological argument cannot work.

Some, such as the Ontological Argument, are highly controversial among theists.

The Ontological Argument states that God exists because he is perfect.

The ontological argument reflected the classical concept of "perfections".

This has a striking similarity to the ontological argument of St. Anselm.

Malcolm was also a defender of a modal version of the ontological argument.

The traditional definition of an ontological argument was given by Immanuel Kant.

"Does the ontological argument beg the question?"

The work also contains a critique of the ontological argument similar to a later critique by Kant.

The concept of a metaphysically necessary being plays an important role in the ontological argument for the existence of God.

His rejection of the ontological argument caused other Catholic theologians to also reject the argument.

His proof for the existence of God was a variation of the Ontological argument.

Thirdly, it presupposes the Ontological argument, already proved false.