knighthood

The answer is no, a knighthood cannot be far behind.

The military side of life was very important to knighthood.

What would happen to him, do you think, if the Knighthood should fall?

Long ago, it had been used for the dead of the Knighthood.

He is reported to have turned down a knighthood in 1995.

In 1958 he was given a knighthood for his work on the books.

In 1915 he received a knighthood for services to the country.

They could wait for her attention until the knighthood had been ground under.

There were knighthoods in this project and he knew it.

His career as a judge led to a knighthood in 1807.

He received a knighthood in 1997 for services to local government and the environment.

His knighthood, she had told him, was due to her.

Then he asked me what order of knighthood I belonged to?

The offer of a knighthood was in the post when he died.

He was awarded a knighthood for his services to the state in 1920.

It was the same attitude which he had taken to the knighthood.

In Shakespeare's day, a man with enough money could buy a knighthood.

It is unknown how and why he got his knighthood.

He was awarded a Knighthood for "services to local government".

In 1952, during his time as Speaker, he received a knighthood.

He was offered a knighthood in 1987, but turned it down for personal and political reasons.

The importance of his work was recognized with a knighthood in 1905.

He was offered a knighthood but chose to be given money instead.

The granting of the knighthood was well received by the public.

At the end of his term as chairman he received a knighthood.