The inverse square law got me, but it saved you.
It follows the inverse square law, like gravity or broadcast radio.
But why should it be an inverse square law?
It is a good idea to be a little more specific when defining mathematical relationships like 'inverse square law'.
Not all electrical fields (forces) obey an inverse square law.
Does not the signal dissipation follow the inverse square law?
The inverse square law is accurate and correctly applied here.
Newton's role in relation to the inverse square law was not as it has sometimes been represented.
In practice they follow an inverse square law between source and receiver.
The force generated by a magnetic field does not obey an inverse square law - a fact.