It is a world with a good deal of government intervention already.
Without government intervention, countries will produce what they do best.
But should market failure be the only reason for government intervention?
Government intervention in interest rates was also a cause of the financial crisis.
The net result would mean less Government intervention, not more.
The scale of these government interventions was however too small to really change the situation.
And the Internet's culture, too, lines up against government intervention.
It took government intervention to make them up their production and bring prices down.
I'm interested in the human side of economic freedom and government intervention.
I would suggest that government intervention in the free market is the real cause.