function point

Function Point stands out to be the best measure of size in this case.

If that indeed is the case, the change has to be planned, for example through the usage of function points.

Programmers start writing a heck of a lot more function points.

As a consequence, the amount of effort required to develop the application would be different (hours per function point).

Big waste of time, prone to bugs, does nothing, but each file you touch adds a function point.

Traditional Function Points use a size scale with a limited range of possible sizes for each component.

This correlates with about 16-27 lines of code per function point implemented in a 4GL.

The most common for measuring functional size is Function Point Analysis.

Function Point Analysis measures the size of the software deliverable from a user's perspective.

The number of function points would be exactly the same, but aspects of the application would be different.

Function point, a unit of measurement to express the amount of business functionality an information system provides to a user.

Traditional Function Points were designed to measure only the functionality 'seen' by human users of business software in the application layer.

However, Function Points can be derived from requirements and therefore are useful in methods such as estimation by proxy.

The first metric is "function points".

Unlike Lines of Code, the number of Function Points will remain constant.

AFP provides a standard for automating the Function Point measure.

The current version of the standard Function Point analysis Counting Practices Manual is 4.3.

The International Function Point User Group is a non-profit organization originally set up in 1986.

Capers Jones is an American specialist in software engineering methodologies, and is often associated with the function point model of cost estimation.

A quantitative definition of 4GL has been set by Capers Jones, as part of his work on function point analysis.

Once the function is identified and categorized into a type, it is then assessed for complexity and assigned a number of function points.

After FBS is translated into function points, it is then converted into as:

The SNAP sizing process is very similar to the function point sizing process.

Some care is needed to avoid the effect of duplication when arriving at cost estimates using both function points and SNAP points.

Work effort used to develop function points cannot be also credited with developing SNAP points, as these are two separate aspects of software.