During his graduate studies, he began to distance himself from classical analytic philosophy.
Both his early and later work have been major influences in the development of analytic philosophy.
In the English-speaking world, analytic philosophy became the dominant school for much of the 20th century.
This emphasis can also be found in analytic philosophy, but with starkly different results.
Early analytic philosophy had a less positive view of ordinary language.
With a few others, he has been responsible for introducing analytic philosophy to the French speaking community.
He has made significant contributions to the analytic philosophy of medicine.
Both of these works are regarded as very important for analytic philosophy.
This difference does not match the separation between analytic and continental philosophy.
I'm not out to criticize analytic philosophy as a style.