In most countries torture is illegal, and this being so, outside the normal framework for establishing guilt or innocence.
The person to whom the report was made should also be shown to help to establish guilt.
A trial is for the purpose of establishing guilt or innocence.
Establishing such clear guilt at such a high level is worth the cost and effort.
They also said no forensic evidence was submitted to establish guilt.
Should you feel the need to heap accusation and establish guilt, it is I who must be addressed.
Circumstantial evidence is used in criminal courts to establish guilt or innocence through reasoning.
The law requires the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
So these are the bare facts, but I ask myself, is that enough to establish guilt or innocence?
Innocence is a negative and can never be established; you can only establish guilt.