documentary hypothesis

In the early decades of the 20th century this debate was dominated by the documentary hypothesis.

In time the documentary hypothesis emerged from these studies.

In terms of the documentary hypothesis, the narrative can be allocated to the E source.

Under the documentary hypothesis, the list is believed to have originally been a distinct and separate source text.

Its place in the documentary hypothesis is anomalous, as it, unlike the other four, consists of a single "source".

"A documentary hypothesis for the relationship between Q and Thomas must be ruled out.

The book remains the most complete critique to date of the documentary hypothesis by a mainstream biblical scholar.

He is credited with being one of the originators of the documentary hypothesis.

The resulting argument, called the documentary hypothesis, remained the dominant model among biblical scholars until later in the 20th century.

While there are many opponents to the Documentary Hypothesis, the majority of biblical scholars support it.

The Documentary Hypothesis was intended only as a more accessible overview drawn from that earlier work.

See the entries on Biblical Higher criticism and the Documentary hypothesis.

Out of source criticism developed the Documentary Hypothesis.

He became arguably best known for the Documentary hypothesis on the origin of the Pentateuch.

According to the documentary hypothesis, D Source of the Torah is written.

The second, the "supplementary" model, had been popular before the documentary hypothesis dominated the field and has re-emerged since the 1970s.

Some secular scholars who follow the Documentary Hypothesis find evidence of three separate sources in the parshah.

He builds on the "documentary hypothesis" accepted by most biblical scholars since the 19th century, but tilts it in a surprising direction.

If applied, this approach would provide an alternative framework to the documentary hypothesis, which maintains that the Torah was written by multiple authors.

The explanation called the documentary hypothesis dominated much of the 20th century, but the 20th-century consensus surrounding this hypothesis has now broken down.

First, he held to the documentary hypothesis and printed his Bible in different typefaces according to which author he believed had written each particular section.

In short, the credence given the Documentary Hypothesis served extraneous cultural tendencies and biases.

Its originality lay in its detailed critique of the documentary hypothesis, and it remains a standard text on many reading lists.

Similarly, the repetition and stylistic variation which the documentary hypothesis explains as the remains of distinct sources, may be understood quite differently.

In the documentary hypothesis, the Holiness Code is considered part of the Priestly source.