dispensational

This view was also popular among 19th- and 20th-century dispensational premillenialists.

This has led to certain fundamental dispensational beliefs, such as a distinction between Israel and the church.

This is a small introduction and defense of premillennialism from a dispensational perspective.

Below is a table comparing some of the various dispensational schemes:

It was during this time that Welch began to develop his dispensational approach to the Bible.

Dispensational premillennialism is held by many evangelicals in the United States.

Dispensational premillennialism generally holds that Israel and the Church are separate.

It is accepted in dispensational churches, particularly in fundamentalist movements.

Progressive and traditional dispensationalists hold to many common beliefs, including views that are uniquely dispensational.

While the Acts 2 position tries to distance itself from its more consistent dispensational brothers, they are all true dispensationalists.

Major dispensational views divide history into some seven dispensations or ages:

A defense from a classical dispensational perspective.

A major difference of historic and dispensational premillennialism is the view of the church in relation to Israel.

They are generally dispensational, and pretribulational in eschatology.

He continued to write dispensational expositions in the journal until it ceased publication in 1915.

He proposed an early dispensational scheme.

Welch promoted the Acts 28 position which he believed "is indeed of the utmost dispensational importance to the believer today.

This was the first time that a premillennial, dispensational framework of Christian theology had been systematized into a single format.

Theologically, they are evangelical and dispensational.

John Walvoord and Charles Ryrie are two traditional dispensational authors.

The dispensational interpretation of the chronological scheme of 9:24-27 is very widely used today in the English-speaking world and beyond.

Smith's teachings were rooted in dispensational restorationism.

Numerous dispensational scholars came to a rough consensus and in the early 1990s produced three main books articulating progressive dispensationalist views.

King's transmillennialism emerged in the late 1990s as an alternative to dispensational premillennialism, amillennialism or postmillennialism.

These two groups are called "hyper-dispensationalists" and "ultra-dispensationalists" because they tend to take dispensational concepts farther than their more traditional brethren.