creationist

Most people in America today are creationists of a sort.

Many creationists believe the Bible shows life on earth cannot be more than 10,000 years old.

At about that time, the traditional creationists took up the phrase.

This was far longer than the age of the earth as calculated by the creationists.

Creationists argue that the earth is only a few thousand years old.

I find it strange that anyone can take creationists seriously.

In a later election, creationists once again won enough seats to get a 6-to-4 majority.

Most Americans today are "creationists" in the strict sense of that term.

I encountered the theory of evolution, and my parents were creationists.

Creationists are the dinosaurs of today and on the road to extinction!

This response just goes to show that creationists believe out of fear and a deep desire to be more special than they are.

Creationists say a divine being created humans and other species.

A common claim of creationists is that evolution has never been observed.

Old Earth creationists and some others do not necessarily dispute these figures.

Some young Earth creationists would later incorporate parts of his arguments.

The holes that Creationists argue for do not actually exist.

We tend to assume that strong creationists are absolutely certain, and as a matter of fact, we'd probably usually be right.

Would that be a point of agreement with creationists?

To the Editor: So the creationists are at it again.

Creationists have taken these points as evidence against evolution and interpreted them to support their own claims.

So creationists and "ultra-Darwinists" have that in common at least.

"We think this is a matter of discrimination against creationists," he said in a telephone interview.

Most creationists use intelligent design as an explanation of how life was formed.

Creationists usually do not believe that all of today's living things came about from simple organisms changing slowly over time.

In response, creationists have disputed the level of scientific support for evolution.

Free catalog listing dozens of Creationist publications.

So Creationist jokesters say, "I believe in God instead of evolution."

But I'm also curious about 'fairness' because this strikes me as a good example of the 'creationist' problem.

Some of the UK schools have for example already come under the control of Creationist organisations.

Interesting, the quote you are replying to clearly states 'creationist' but you reply as an outraged religious person.

From that you go onto a 'creationist' reading nd I'll say it yet again you don't need to be a theist to do that.

(Creationist paleontology.)

These "scientists" have joined forces with the debunkers, even founding official-sounding 'skeptics' groups" that have Creationist motives.

In light of the fact that the documentation provided by Creationist publications is specious, one is still left with trying to explain the source of this citation.

Larry Vardiman is a Creationist scientist with a Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science from Colorado State University.

David Cameron's idea to get new schools established by September just beggars belief, unless he has big business already waiting in the wings to add to the number of 'creationist' schools.

We're already seeing this has effectively won the battle in the US; even those that aren't what they would consider religious fall back on the Creationist chant "Let both sides be heard!"

Rose also waded into the ongoing debate between Biblical creationism and evolution, asserting in Genesis, Creation and Early Man that Orthodox patristics exclusively supported the Creationist viewpoint.

For example, Duane Gish, a leading Creationist proponent, wrote in a letter to Discover magazine (July 1981): "Stephen Jay Gould states that creationists claim creation is a scientific theory.

Though the theory seems an obvious fact to us in today's genetic age, however, the theory was not given much credence in former times because of the dominance for many centuries of Creationist theories of life's origins.

Mort argues that one of the difficulties facing Christian science fiction authors who endorse Creationism-especially those writing "hard" science fiction-is reconciling the limits placed on the author in exploring science within a Creationist framework.

In his most recent book, "Cosmos, Creator and Human Destiny", Hunt supported the Creationist viewpoint and alleged that there were deficiencies in both the Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution.

The way in which bio-inspired computing differs from traditional artificial intelligence (AI) is in how it takes a more evolutionary approach to learning, as opposed to the what could be described as 'creationist' methods used in traditional AI.

Another was the story of Dinosaur Adventureland, a Creationist dinosaur theme park whose owner claimed that he was not required to pay the $600,000 in payroll taxes he owed to the IRS because he was employed by God.

Darwin on Trial mentioned Pandas as "'creationist' only in the sense that it juxtaposes a paradigm of 'intelligent design' with the dominant paradigm of (naturalistic) evolution", but his use of the term as a focus for his wedge strategy promoting "theistic realism" came later.

To dismiss any reasonable question (and one about an animal which has not apparently changed for millions of years is perfectly reasonable if, for example, the questioner were not an evolutionary biologist) as 'creationist' or 'denigrating' simply demonstrates the narrow-minded approach which is being criticised.

This quote is often utilized in Creationist publications and websites in an attempt to demonstrate that Watson, and thus by extension promoters of evolution in general, simply dismiss creationist viewpoints outright due to a presumed antitheistic bias.

'Scientific American' July 20, 1998.TalkOrigins Archive response to Creationist claims - Claim CB932: Evolution of degenerate forms Although evolution of complexity have evolved, this occurs as a side effect of the overall number of organisms increasing, and simple forms of life remain more common.

In March 2011, responding to a letter from the BCSE expressing concern about the possibility that the government might fund schools based on a Creationist viewpoint, the Department of Education stated that the Secretary of State for Education was "crystal clear that teaching creationism is at odds with scientific fact".