competitive exclusion principle

According to the competitive exclusion principle, species less suited to compete for resources should either adapt or die out.

According to the competitive exclusion principle, only a small number of plankton species should be able to coexist on these resources.

According to the competitive exclusion principle, no two species can occupy the same niche in the same environment for a long time.

Again, this process does not include any evolutionary change of individual species, but it is merely the product of the competitive exclusion principle.

Gause formulated his Competitive exclusion principle, through experiments involving paramecia.

This is the competitive exclusion principle.

This occurrence is best explained by the competitive exclusion principle, which dictates that two complete competitors cannot co-exist.

The competitive exclusion principle states that two species cannot coexist indefinitely by living off the same limiting resource; one will always outcompete the other.

According to Gause's "competitive exclusion principle" no two species with identical ecological requirements can coexist in a stable environment.

Birds were also widely used in studies of the niche hypothesis and Georgii Gause's competitive exclusion principle.

Due to its simplicity and intuitiveness, Gause's Competitive exclusion principle has had a great impact on subsequent ecological thinking.

In 1932, Georgii Gause created the competitive exclusion principle based on experiments with cultures of yeast and paramecium.

In 1932, Gause published what has become known as the competitive exclusion principle, based on experimental work done with mixed cultures of both yeast and Paramecium species.

Some competing species have been shown to coexist on the same resource with no observable evidence of niche differentiation and in "violation" of the competitive exclusion principle.

This concept is a corollary of the competitive exclusion principle, which states that, controlling for all else, two species competing for exactly the same resources cannot stably coexist.

The competitive exclusion principle states that if two species' ecological niches overlap, there is a very high likelihood of competition as both species are in direct competition for the same resources.

This process allows two species to partition certain resources so that one species does not out-compete the other as dictated by the competitive exclusion principle; thus, coexistence is obtained through the differentiation of their ecological niches.

The paradox results from the competitive exclusion principle (sometimes referred to as Gause's Law), which suggests that when two species compete for the same resource, ultimately only one will persist and the other will be driven to extinction.

The differing coloration therefore does not indicate their evolutionary history, but rather seems to have evolved independently, to underscore the visual distinctness between taxa, thus helping to keep their gene pools separate (see also Competitive exclusion principle).

In agriculture, fungi may be useful if they actively compete for nutrients and space with pathogenic microorganisms such as bacteria or other fungi via the competitive exclusion principle, or if they are parasites of these pathogens.

In accordance with the competitive exclusion principle, no other species can inhabit the same late summer niche as D. lumholtzi; another factor that allows it to have higher survivorship than other Daphnia species and is ultimately a better invader.

In ecology, the competitive exclusion principle, sometimes referred to as Gause's law of competitive exclusion or just Gause's law, is a proposition which states that two species competing for the same resources cannot coexist if other ecological factors are constant.

The competitive exclusion principle states that two species that use the same resource in the same way in the same space and time cannot coexist and must diverge from each other over time in order for the two species to coexist.

The rationale for character displacement stems from the competitive exclusion principle, also called Gause's Law, which contends that to coexist in a stable environment two competing species must differ in their respective ecological niche; without differentiation, one species will eliminate or exclude the other through competition.

The impact of feral American minks on European mink populations has been explained through the competitive exclusion principle and because the American mink reproduces a month earlier than the European species, and matings between male American minks and female European minks result in the embryos being reabsorbed.