For many years, chemical weapons were in the hands of a few countries.

We've seen him use chemical weapons on his own people.

And would Iraq's response be the use of chemical weapons?

And 10 of them are said to have or be working on chemical weapons.

According to international law, it is wrong to use chemical weapons.

We know, for example, that he has used chemical weapons on his own people.

In the past, Iraq used chemical weapons to kill people.

He's the only leader in the world that's actually used chemical weapons against his own people.

He gave no details of what the new chemical weapons were.

That could explain, officials here say, why no chemical weapons have been used so far.

B15 The military found remains of chemical weapons at 215 sites.

So far no biological or chemical weapons have been found in Iraq.

"If he didn't want to have chemical weapons, what happened to me?"

Another big question remains, about why Iraqi forces have not used chemical weapons.

Administration officials say there is evidence that both countries may have chemical weapons or the potential to produce them.

However, if it wasn't nuclear then we'd be going on about chemical weapons or something, anything.

Iraq also used chemical weapons against its own Kurdish population.

Do you have any update on those possible chemical weapons?

Even the fury of the whole world over chemical weapons.

The air force had launched an attack with chemical weapons.

Others say that chemical weapons may now be less important to Soviet military strategy.

These are to be replaced by a new generation of chemical weapons.

Washington says the plant is intended for the production of chemical weapons.

He said the issue was whether Iran could use the equipment to make chemical weapons.

In fact, biological and chemical weapons are not quite that easy to make or use.

We've seen him use chemical weapons on his own people.

For many years, chemical weapons were in the hands of a few countries.

And 10 of them are said to have or be working on chemical weapons.

We know, for example, that he has used chemical weapons on his own people.

And would Iraq's response be the use of chemical weapons?

According to international law, it is wrong to use chemical weapons.

In the past, Iraq used chemical weapons to kill people.

He gave no details of what the new chemical weapons were.

That could explain, officials here say, why no chemical weapons have been used so far.

He's the only leader in the world that's actually used chemical weapons against his own people.

Do you have any update on those possible chemical weapons?

So far no biological or chemical weapons have been found in Iraq.

Even the fury of the whole world over chemical weapons.

In fact, biological and chemical weapons are not quite that easy to make or use.

Chemical weapons continued to be used by the Iraq regime against its own people.

At one time, it was a key center of Iraq's biological and chemical weapons programs.

Keep in mind that Hussein had already used chemical weapons against his own people.

Iraq also used chemical weapons against its own Kurdish population.

The air force had launched an attack with chemical weapons.

It was once a center for the manufacture of chemical weapons.

Another big question remains, about why Iraqi forces have not used chemical weapons.

He said the issue was whether Iran could use the equipment to make chemical weapons.

Others say that chemical weapons may now be less important to Soviet military strategy.

Administration officials say that still other chemical weapons initiatives are in the works.

This was the first time a government used chemical weapons against its own civilian population.