casual reader

The casual reader might let that pass: I find it difficult to do so.

For the casual reader of the magazine, each story is complete In itself.

To a casual reader, it would have seemed quite plausible.

Casual readers, however, will probably drop out after a couple of hundred pages.

Despite what casual readers might think, science fiction is not about prediction.

The diversity of this material stands out even to the casual reader.

The casual reader will find it all a pretty hard slog.

This system also does not help the casual reader, but is the best for scholarly purposes.

This allows new and casual readers to continue to discover our content on the open Web.

What is not immediately observable to a casual reader of science fiction?

A casual reader might think prosperity did not exist before the junk bond.

Written for both the serious scholar and casual reader.

It is a must for professional and casual readers alike.'

But any casual reader might have mistaken the story for a paid ad in the magazine section.

He begins with so many disclaimers as to discourage the casual reader.

Nevertheless, the casual reader may feel overwhelmed by the sheer volume of information.

His arguments, to a casual reader, might sound compelling.

It seemed designed to seize the casual reader at station bookstalls.

A problem without a solution may interest the student, but can hardly fail to annoy the casual reader.

Still, this is not a book for the casual reader, nor even your average history buff, who might well find its detail overwhelming.

Here is an example of how easily casual readers can go wrong when accusing the press of error.

Such bombast may tempt the casual reader to join Pop.

Absolutely, but each of those serious readers buys 50 times the books the casual readers do.

It is immediately accessible to the casual reader, while offering engaging reads for the week ahead.

More casual readers may wish for fewer letters, since the drawback of the book is its size, at 880 pages.