breach of duty

But it is not a breach of duty to any particular individual.

If they happen to be right, then please lodge an action for breach of duty against us.

And it is not that breach of duty which gives rise to the action.

He ruled that there was "no breach of duty in this case".

"At the very least, it appears to be a serious breach of duty.

This basic test is whether the damage would not have occurred but for the breach of duty.

He said the failure to ensure sums were paid to him was a breach of duty.

Then, and then only, is there a breach of duty giving rise to an action.

But they would, because it would be a breach of duty, even by the most senior official.

The idea that he had committed a "serious breach of duty" made him grind his teeth together.

Once a breach of duty of care has been established, an action brought in a common law court would most likely be successful.

There has been a breach of duty by an engine driver in failing to sound his whistle.

(d) That the damage was caused by the breach of duty.

Owen J held this failure to disclose meant a breach of duty.

The plaintiff suffered an injury to his back at work in 1973, caused by the defendant's breach of duty.

The plaintiff must prove that his damage would not have occurred, but for the defendant's breach of duty.

But in addition, third it must be shown that there was a causal link between the breach of duty and harm.

Factual causation: Whether or not a given injury would have occurred without a breach of duty.

In the event neither the manager nor the owners were held to be in breach of duty.

It is usually used where the breach of duty was ongoing or when the gain is hard to identify.

However, his hold on the property was short lived due to a breach of duty to Duke William.

"It would be a breach of duty if I failed to report so serious a matter as a League raid like this!"

Mr President, it is a shame that the general guidelines on the economy constitute a breach of duty.

The but for test also presents problems where the breach of duty consists of an omission to act.

The defendant argued that any liability which he had, extended only from his breach of duty until the armed robbery.