aggrieved person

The aggrieved person shall have no right to move the court under Article 32.

The aggrieved person can take the matter to the notice of the high court."

The tribunal has to be approached within 45 days of the aggrieved person getting the order.

The aggrieved person must choose one or the other.

The aggrieved person would fast on the doorstep of the offender.

Contributory negligence of the aggrieved person might be a defence.

Any aggrieved person can register a complaint by presenting a simple application.

"Complainant is not therefore an aggrieved person with standing to file a complaint."

Once the agency's own procedures are finished, or "exhausted", then the aggrieved person can file a complaint in a federal court.

In addition, an individual, organization, or agency may file a charge on behalf of another person in order to protect the aggrieved person's identity.

If a local court order is not being - complied with, the aggrieved person may approach the court for redress.

Firstly, the lex applied only where the aggrieved person was the dominus.

The term "eleventh hour" refers to a time of last resort in an aggrieved person's life, as he faces a potential nervous breakdown.

However, should the court determine that such surveillance was lawfully authorised and conducted, they may deny the motion of the aggrieved person.

(c) otherwise injures or harms the aggrieved person.

An aggrieved person can lodge a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission.

"Without a doubt," he wrote, plaintiffs have alleged enough to plead 'aggrieved persons' status so as to proceed to the next step in proceedings."

It's a hard thing to do, Mr. Mathews said, "especially if you are an aggrieved person nursing a grudge."

(d) otherwise injures or causes harm, whether physical or mental, to the aggrieved person."

In order to obtain damages, an aggrieved person must be able to establish a private law claim in contract or tort law.

So a regulatory framework needed to be created to counteract the impairment of legitimate interests of the aggrieved person in the processing of personal data.

The bill authorizes any aggrieved person or agency to take complaints to Federal District Court, where a fine of up to $5,000 a day could be imposed.

The bills generally say courts should take such cases "without regard to whether the aggrieved person has exhausted any administrative or other remedies that may be provided by law."

(2002) where the question was whether an aggrieved person is entitled to any relief against the final judgement/order of the Supreme Court, after dismissal of a review petition.

"Failure of the aggrieved person to raise a matter in counseling may result in subsequent dismissal of the formal EEO complaint.