whig history

This is now regarded as an example of Whig history.

More recently, some scholars have argued that Whig history is essential to the history of science.

Whig history is liberal historiography, written to show the inevitable progress of mankind.

However this must be seen in the context of the self-serving whig history of Hume's time.

He falls prey to the common error of Whig history: interpreting past events as if they were inevitable stepping stones to the present.

It's the Wired version of Whig history: ever better, onward and upward, progress unstopped.

This kind of anachronism is considered to be a form of Whig history and is a special problem among historians of science.

Whig history further explains the Whig interpretation of history that Macaulay espoused.

'Whig history' presents the past as an inevitable progression towards ever greater liberty and enlightenment, culminating in modern forms of liberal democracy and constitutional monarchy.

His published works include assessments of the Whig interpretation of history ('Whig history') and of historiography generally.

"Whig history" or "whiggishness" are often used as synonyms for Presentism, particularly when the historical depiction in question is teleological or triumphalist.

Paul Rapin de Thoyras's history of England, published in 1723, became "the classic Whig history" for the first half of the 18th century.

Contemporary biographers of William considered it to be his cruelest act and a stain upon his soul, but the deed was not mainstream knowledge before Whig history.

Herbert Butterfield's The Whig Interpretation of History (1931) attacked Whig history.

The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual Origins of the American Revolution.

Subsequent generations of academic historians have similarly rejected Whig history because of its presentist and teleological assumption that history is driving toward some sort of goal.

Whig history has many similarities with the Marxist-Leninist theory of history, which believes that humanity is moving (through historical stages) to the classless, egalitarian society of communism.

Whig history is a form of liberalism, that puts its faith in the power of human reason to reshape society for the better, regardless of past history and tradition.

William Stubbs (1825-1901), the constitutional historian and influential teacher of a generation of historians, became a crucial figure in the later survival and respectability of Whig history.

The characteristics of Whig history as defined by Butterfield include interpreting history as a story of progress toward the present, and specifically toward the British constitutional settlement.

The British historian Herbert Butterfield coined the term "Whig history" in his short but influential book The Whig Interpretation of History (1931).

James Mackintosh then sought to write a Whig history of the Glorious Revolution, published in 1834 as the History of the Revolution in England in 1688.

The writing of Whig history of science is especially found in the writings of scientists and general historians, while this whiggish tendency is commonly opposed by professional historians of science.