Treaty of Nice

The Treaty of Nice is actually in the main about something else.

I cannot agree with the view you set out here, that the Treaty of Nice is a success.

Unfortunately this will not change following the Treaty of Nice.

The Treaty of Nice increased this to 732 and set out the future distribution for up to 27 states.

The Treaty of Nice is the worst mess to date.

This means that the Treaty of Nice has failed.

The Treaty of Nice is still crucial and cannot be sidestepped.

We were told that the Treaty of Nice was essential for enlargement.

The imbalance which existed before the Treaty of Nice is not even taken into account.

The Treaty of Nice has not resolved many of these issues.

The Treaty of Nice has failed to be adopted.

The provisions of the Treaty of Nice do not change that.

The Treaty of Nice is not enough to meet the requirements of the 21st century.

We still have to ratify the Treaty of Nice.

If that were the case, the last enlargement would never have happened, because the Treaty of Nice was clearly insufficient.

The Treaty of Nice is not an adequate basis for successful further enlargement.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Treaty of Nice is dead.

Together, we have said, 'This was actually already an agreement under the Treaty of Nice'.

The Treaty of Nice itself contains the seed of such a reform.

This is because the institutional issues involved in the enlargement are not resolved by the Treaty of Nice.

Our group does not share the opinion that the Treaty of Nice was an absolute condition for enlargement.

It is worth my adding that the Treaty of Nice makes provision for enhanced cooperation.

The Treaty of Nice was justified by the needs of enlargement.

If the Treaty of Nice is finally ratified by the autumn of 2002, there will still be time to support it.

The Treaty of Nice is scarcely comprehensible, let alone explainable.