software patent

We really need to do away with software patents in general.

You can never be sure, which is the problem with software patents.

The campaign against software patents has been going on for a long time.

I do think that software patents are a good thing.

In other words, this has nothing to do with software patents.

Software patent are not protection but an attack against the small companies.

Everyone says that they do not want to see software patents.

The actual results of software patents just don't make any sense.

This isn't a good case if your fighting against software patents.

I don't like pure software patents, but these are something different.

Policy debate on software patents has been active for years.

The one thing I believe should be changed for pure software patents is the time.

Made a bit more complicated by the fact that it's a software patent.

The change was made because of a software patent restriction.

On the one hand, Google has a point about the low quality of software patents.

"Microsoft was our age when it got its first software patent," he said.

And none of this stops me from being against software patents in general.

The expression "software patent" itself has not been clearly defined.

There is more than enough legal ammunition above 2007 that will put this software patent to rest.

All software patents are bad, and the solution has to come at the legislative level.

Google is scared of software patents for the same reason.

"The commission appears to be taking a wise approach to the software patent law," he said.

If you want the open source market to grow then remove the software patent legislation.

I urge all those opposed to software patents to be present in force.