Non-Proliferation Treaty
NPT

The NPT is even more important now than it was in the past.

The decision to withdraw from the NPT may well be part of that.

Unfortunately, not even the NPT has been able to prevent that.

Talks started this week on whether to renew the NPT in 1995.

They have no plans to disarm or sign the NPT.

China was not a signatory to the NPT until 1992.

How could we possibly let them develop nuclear power under the NPT?

The forthcoming NPT review is an opportunity that must not be wasted.

Strengthening the effectiveness of the NPT will make the world safer.

The state is required to give reasons for leaving the NPT in this notice.

Furthermore, countries that had not signed the NPT were urged to do so.

The signatories to the NPT have been excellent role models.

In that respect, the fabric of the NPT is at stake really.

In 2011, there were 516 reported crimes in the NPT.

The cause of NPT is not known with certainty.

Ultimately, we hope they will elect to join the NPT."

Iraq, as an NPT party, was obliged to declare all facilities but did not do so.

Israel isn't in the NPT, so there's no point talking about them within its framework.

Unfortunately the whole story of the NPT is singularly lacking in success stories.

Respect for the whole NPT is at stake.

Signatories to NPT are to discuss extending the treaty in 1995.

The reality is that the NPT is not working.

This position is held in common with all five nuclear states as defined in the NPT.

At the time the NPT was proposed, there were predictions of 25-30 nuclear weapon states within 20 years.

The impetus behind the NPT was concern for the safety of a world with many nuclear weapon states.