Lords of Appeal in Ordinary
Law Lords

The other Lords of Appeal in Ordinary received £179,431.

The case was heard by five sitting Lords of Appeal in Ordinary:

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary were entitled to emoluments.

The matter was reheard by a panel of seven Lords of Appeal in Ordinary.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary were often called upon to chair important public inquiries, such as the Hutton inquiry.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary traditionally did not participate in political debates, so as to maintain judicial independence.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary were, by custom, appointed to the Privy Council if not already members.

Finally, some qualifications apply only in the case of the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary.

Between 1876 and 1972 there were 63 Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (Law Lords).

List of Senior Lords of Appeal in Ordinary

The fact that Lords of Appeal in Ordinary and other senior judges are invited to advise the visitor show that this cannot be assumed.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary held the rank of Baron and seats in the House for life.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary - Law Lords - receive life baronies on appointment unless they are already ennobled.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary were joined by a number of Lords of Appeal.

Under the terms of the Act, there may be no more than 12 Lords of Appeal in Ordinary under the age of 75 at one time.

Life peers (created under statutory authority as law lords)Eminent lawyers were appointed as Lords of Appeal in Ordinary from 1876.

The Committee consisted of three Lords of Appeal or Lords of Appeal in Ordinary.

By convention, at least two of the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary were Scottish and at least one from Northern Ireland.

Judicial appeals were heard by Lords of Appeal in Ordinary and Lords of Appeal under the age of seventy-five.

By convention, only the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary and Lords of Appeal participated in judicial matters.

He and nine other Lords of Appeal in Ordinary became Justices of the Supreme Court upon that body's inauguration on 1 October 2009.

Three years thereafter the number of the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary was increased to nine and one of the new seats was assigned to Morton.

Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, more commonly known as Law Lords, were first appointed under the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876.

It is therefore unlikely that future appointees to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom will be made Lords of Appeal in Ordinary.

Thus, Lords of Appeal in Ordinary ceased to be paid at the time they ceased to hold office and became Lords of Appeal.

And that's not something anyone has said about the law lords in more than a century.

Both the law lords I interviewed have given a great deal of thought to the new court's public image.

It turns out that the law lords have not yet decided who is to decide this "very important question".

The Law Lords will again consider the immunity issue next month.

The case was heard by five law lords.

The Law Lords constitute the highest court in the land.

But in 1975, the Law Lords said this test caused confusion.

The commission referred to a recent case decided by the Law Lords.

The Law Lords said they had "no power to right the other wrongs."

But that was not true, said Lady Hale, another of the law lords.

The law lords are currently considering whether they should sit more often as a court of seven or nine, rather the usual five.

He's not going to get past three law lords.'

Formerly, the most senior of the Law Lords took these posts.

To my mind the Law Lords make the right ethical decision which serves the greater good.

Then again, we are also talking about a bunch of crazed 'law lords' who play fancy dress.

The Law Lords certainly seemed to stretch themselves to arrive at their conclusion.

The appeal was dismissed unanimously by the law lords.

There was, however, no provision whereby the number of Law Lords could be regulated.

Otherwise the Law Lords will be able to gag us."

But the law lords did pronounce, obscurely, on that.

The minimum number of Law Lords that could form a Committee was four.

The right to privacy had been developed by the Court of Appeal and the law lords in recent cases, he added.

The law lords last week drastically cut the number of charges on which Pinochet can be extradited from 32 to three.

Following oral argument the Law Lords inevitably take time to consider their opinions.

So the Law Lords considered whether a threat to strike could be 'unlawful' in this sense.