the Copernican system

The case is the same with regard to the Copernican system.

In the Copernican system, no such artificial move is necessary.

His name is particularly linked to the controversy over the Copernican system.

Let us look at some of the forceful arguments against the Copernican system.

One such arose from a technicality associated with the Copernican system.

This theory was received for ages, until superseded by the Copernican system.

He ends the almanac with a short concise account of the Copernican system.

His point was that, even if physical propositions were a matter of faith (which he wanted to deny), the Copernican system would have the edge.

There is no reason to suppose that he was sufficiently interested in the Copernican system to set biblical authority against it.

The person who contributed most significantly to the defence of the Copernican system was Galileo.

Galileo's new mechanics enabled the Copernican system to be defended against some of the objections to it mentioned above.

There was also an uneasiness regarding the Bible as a barrier to the Copernican system.

Ptolemaic model, the Copernican system had /no/ advantages for simplicity or accuracy!

His duties are measured by that instrument he is; and a right and perfect man would be felt to the centre of the Copernican system.

No, the Copernican system had epicycles as well (at one point, more than the Ptolemaic models of the time).

For him the Copernican system ... is spiritually contemptible.

The Copernican system was no more accurate than Ptolemy's system, because it still used circular orbits.

In this chapter Gilbert argues in favor of the Copernican System.

And a caviller might raise all the same objections to the Copernican system, which you have urged against my reasonings.

During the 1620s the opinion had been expressed in Catholic circles that the Copernican system ought not to be condemned.

Meanwhile that one Catholic entertained the hope that his freedom to defend the Copernican system might yet be restored.

One of his students, Johannes Kepler, quickly became an adherent to the Copernican system.

The Copernican system, Bruno believed, fitted perfectly in such a universe and provided a model for other planetary systems extending to infinity.

Like Galileo, he was committed to the Copernican system as a cosmology and not merely as a mathematical hypothesis.

In evaluating the Copernican system, for example, mathematical criteria should take precedence over interpretations of Scripture, which may have become normative but only through ignorance.