Copenhagen Consensus

These combined interventions were ranked by the Copenhagen Consensus 2008 as the world's best development investment.

In a way, one could say that we are witnessing a move from the Washington consensus to the Copenhagen consensus.

Schelling was a contributing participant of the Copenhagen Consensus.

The 2008 Copenhagen Consensus, a panel of world class economists, analyzed cost-effective solutions to the world's ten biggest challenges.

The 2004 Copenhagen Consensus attracted various criticisms.

"Theories abound, darlings, to explain this uncertainty principle, but the purest is the Copenhagen consensus, right Cyril dear?"

A Global Wish List Economists at the Copenhagen Consensus discussed 38 solutions to the world's problems and ranked 17 of them.

She was also a member of the expert panel convened to produce a Copenhagen Consensus on some of the leading scientific/developmental problems of the 21st century.

Providing micronutrients, including zinc, to humans is one of the four quick-win solutions to major global problems identified in the Copenhagen Consensus from an international panel of distinguished economists.

Commenting on the 2004 Copenhagen Consensus, climatologist and IPCC author Stephen Schneider criticised Lomborg for only inviting economists to participate:

The Copenhagen Consensus, as they called it, was that programs to slow global warming are one of the worst investments - far less worthwhile than programs to immediately combat disease and improve drinking water and sanitation.

The Copenhagen consensus in 2004 stated that lack of both iodine and iron has been implicated in impaired brain development, and this can affect enormous numbers of people: it is estimated that one-third of the total global population are affected by iodine deficiency.

Prior to becoming the Director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and Adjunct Professor at the Copenhagen Business School, Bjørn Lomborg was an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Aarhus.