community law

We cannot make it Community law within the next couple of weeks.

We can only apply existing Community law in such cases.

In this case, there has been a violation of Community law.

In other words, health and the environment are at risk because Community law is not being upheld.

In my opinion, a debate on such an important part of Community law should be carried out through the front rather than the back door.

And that will hit Britain hard if it becomes community law.

Much attention has also been focused on the clarity of Community law.

Citizens may find this difficult to understand when they encounter problems with Community law.

No national constitutional court can set itself up as ruling over Community law.

Nevertheless, these events took place in an area where Community law does apply.

I would like to give you a couple of examples, particularly concerning Community law on the environment.

The resale right is going to be part of Community law.

Let us begin with the gross violation of Community law.

That is the reason for the primacy of Community law.

However, further steps still have to be taken to align national practice with Community law.

I believe that Community law must support the emergence of these new legal bodies.

This report talks about the monitoring of Community law, and that is a good thing.

National courts often turn to the court to ask it to interpret points of community law for them.

Further, as the present case shows, the introduction of a possible Community law defence may transform the situation.

We do not believe that the size of the letters on the information notices should be decided by Community law.

After all, the protagonist of Community law is the citizen.

I turn therefore to the issue of Community law.

The work will be carried out both with community law and the new open coordination method.

This is an important simplification of Community law on the subject.

In this way we will produce legitimate, clear and effective Community laws.